AllYorBaseRBelong2UsSat May 18 19:20:12 2002
PH43R M3!
MagusSat May 18 21:07:58 2002
*cough*post whore*cough*
HarbingerSun May 19 04:28:59 2002
You're occupying too much space on JR's hard drive. :tongue:
Jeremy ReimerSun May 19 06:00:16 2002
testing tables hack...
er...
HarbingerSun May 19 23:52:34 2002
Guess not. Good luck to you, though. ;)
AllYorBaseRBelong2UsMon May 20 00:33:12 2002
One day I shall occupy the space an everyone's harddrive :)
HitScanMon May 20 13:27:00 2002
Jeremy: are the posts enclosed in another tag? a top level div or another table? They have to only be children of the body tag or else they'll be 100% of their parent tag, which will be expanded to fit the largest table.
Jeremy ReimerMon May 20 16:49:55 2002
You mean, say, if there is one <table=100%> blah </table> and inside blah is all the different posts, then the whole blah ends up formatted the width of the largest table inside blah?
How do I prevent this?
MagusMon May 20 17:12:53 2002
Off the top of my head, it seems like you could explicitly set a size for the inner tables.
Jeremy ReimerMon May 20 18:11:34 2002
Wouldn't that pretty much fuck people running at different screen resolutions, though?
Jeremy ReimerMon May 20 18:49:42 2002
We're getting there. I think I've identified the offending table that encompasses the thread. There are two, actually. Why? Who knows...
Jeremy ReimerMon May 20 18:59:13 2002
I think I've done it! I just have to unfuck the buttons at the bottom, and we're done!
MagusMon May 20 19:08:52 2002
Shouldn't if you do it by percentages.
[code]
<table width="100%">
<table width="70%">
</table>
</table>
[/code]
(Edited by Magus at 2:09 pm on May 20, 2002)
MagusMon May 20 19:10:42 2002
Hmmm, my suggestion is no longer needed. That's what I get for taking my time replying.
Jeremy ReimerMon May 20 19:11:00 2002
Nope, it's totally fix0red now, check it out! Large-assed posts get to be large and wide, and everybody else just gets to be normal.
Cool, eh?
HitScanMon May 20 19:23:15 2002
from Jeremy Reimer posted at 11:49 am on May 20, 2002
You mean, say, if there is one <table=100%> blah </table> and inside blah is all the different posts, then the whole blah ends up formatted the width of the largest table inside blah?How do I prevent this?
Well, it's a bit late now, but to answer your questions: Yes, and take them out of the big table. :)
HitScanMon May 20 19:24:46 2002
You should probly set the info cell on the left to have a smaller percentage of the space (or define it in pixels) because it hangs pretty far over on my screen. (granted, it's a 1600x1200, but 1% of your screen is 1% of your sceen reguardless of res. ;) )
Evil MerlinMon May 20 19:43:48 2002
Who cares... if you are not running at least 1280x1024 you don't belong here...
=)
MagusMon May 20 19:50:48 2002
We are teh elitists, eh?
HitScanMon May 20 20:04:15 2002
Who cares... if you are not running at least 1280x1024 you don't belong here... =)
Such is my point. I'm running 1600x1200 and the username, avatar,title cell takes up 2 inches of my screen. :p
Jeremy ReimerMon May 20 20:26:48 2002
Well, I could bump the info cell a bit, if I figure out where the hell it is... it should be easier than finding where the uber-uber-table was that encompassed the whole thread...
HarbingerMon May 20 20:27:20 2002
By all means, JR, submit your findings/solutions to the ik authors. Get some credit for your work!
Evil Merlin:
Who cares... if you are not running at least 1280x1024 you don't belong here... =)
You gonna buy me a new laptop with a nice UXGA-sportin' screen?! :tongue: :D
Jeremy ReimerMon May 20 20:29:31 2002
Okay, I've bumped it from 20% to 16%, this leaves just enough space to put in "1st Lord of the Admiralty" without word wrapping on my screen (I run at 1024x768, I know, I know, but I like it)
EDIT: Actually it's 17% now, because I realized I had to resize the rest of the table to 83% from 80%. I'd like to hardcode the pixels for the user column, but then how do I do the remainder of the table in absolute format?
AllYorBaseRBelong2UsMon May 20 23:01:52 2002
...And my postcount continues to rise towards infinity.
Jeremy ReimerMon May 20 23:12:36 2002
I think I've fixed the reply page as well. Check out the thread review.
HitScanTue May 21 12:47:31 2002
Indeed you have! I didn't expect you to "jump to" and get right on it, but it looks pretty good anyway. :)
HarbingerTue May 21 13:52:52 2002
from AllYorBaseRBelong2Us posted at 7:01 pm on May 20, 2002
...And my postcount continues to rise towards infinity.
Indeed it does!
HitScanTue May 21 14:09:24 2002
from Harbinger posted at 8:52 am on May 21, 2002
from AllYorBaseRBelong2Us posted at 7:01 pm on May 20, 2002
...And my postcount continues to rise towards infinity.
Indeed it does!
as does teh Harb's!
Indeed! ;)
HarbingerTue May 21 19:12:36 2002
The velocity of my posting rate is lower than AYB's; I am not shooting for infinity. ;)