< Back to OSY 1.0 thread list

OSY 1.0 Thread Viewer

Thread #: 1557

AAHP

Imitation Gruel

Fri Mar 15 04:35:14 2002

Association for the Advancement of Human People

Universal Declaration #1
1. No one is inferior to anyone else based on gender
2. No one is inferior to anyone else based on religious beliefs
3. No one is inferior to anyone else based on skin color
4. No one is inferior to anyone else based on nationality

All humans are humans and should be treated as such, equally.
Hurt no one. Take nothing belonging to anyone else. Respect others regardless of their (possible) differences from yourself.

No one has the right to "first strike" anyone else, nor should they. Treat everyone fairly, and well. Treat everyone else as you would treat yourself.

We're all human, and we're all on this Earth because we were born here, and all of us have the equal right to live here.

Support the advancement of human people.

That is all.

Magus

Fri Mar 15 04:45:44 2002

Hear, hear! Well said, IG.
Jeremy Reimer

Fri Mar 15 06:40:50 2002

Works for me.

What if a religious belief dictates that one gender or race is inferior to another (I'm not saying any religions actually do this, although some might)

Riso

Fri Mar 15 09:09:04 2002

Riso's Statement

I am superior to women.
I am superior to anyone believing the church and/or beeing a member of Scientology, or beeing Jewish.
I am superior to any frenchman.

In other words:
Fuck the Universal Declaration #1.

Madan

Fri Mar 15 12:34:47 2002

Interesting philosophy. Of course it *can* be taken to extremes.

Simply take Gardener's concepts about Multiple Intelligences. According to him all kids(and, as such, adults) are *equally* intelligent. They are simply so in different modes of information assimilation.

Apparently, he believes that while people *can* have biological performance deltas physically, mentally all brains are "created equal".

Any of you that have seen morons and stupid bastards and said "well at least I'm *smarter* than him" better watch out because the M.I. philosophy is starting to creep into schools(much to my disgust).

It basically teaches smart, academic book worms that they're less valuable than a jock peer because even though the jock sounds like an ass and is dumb as a brick, he's still as "smart". So technically, the errudite has *nothing* going for him.

This has been bothering a lot of my academic kids when they heard about it in school and I'm NOT using this philosophy in class. I refuse.

While I don't compare childrens' intelligences in class and I do encourage all kids to push pas their limitations, every child should have ONE quality that makes them feel they do better than everyone else.  Some assholes like Gardener would take that away from them.

M.

(Edited by Madan at 4:42 am on Mar. 15, 2002)

AllYorBaseRBelong2Us

Fri Mar 15 15:03:58 2002

My Philosophy:

1) All Your Base are Belong To Us!
2) Tater Tots are good :)

Jeremy Reimer

Fri Mar 15 18:07:18 2002

The idea of multiple intelligences was supposed to allow people with different skills and aptitudes to feel just as worthy as any other human being, not to make everyone identical to everyone else.  Sounds like the people running Public Education totally missed the point (what else is new?)
Harbinger

Fri Mar 15 18:34:49 2002

I am superior to any frenchman.

I think that's a universal given. ;)


Is this like a more-mature version of "Everything I Ever Need To Know, I Learned in Kindergarden?"

All in all, it seems worthy and should be common sense.  However, we know how "common" that is... :angryfire: