Tue Feb 12 11:38:39 2002
personally i think it would suck if BT actually thinks we owe them money for some arcahic patent on something that isn't even related.
Think about it. You might have to pay more to use the internet and all that money goes to BT because they think that links is an invention and not an obvious requirement.
However I think BT should sue Msoft for the web browser style GUI in Windows. I can't remember the number of times i've seen idiots double click on desktop links. Worse is when i see them double click on a link on websites.
argh!!!
I HATE STUPID PEOPLE!!!!!
Tue Feb 12 12:22:54 2002
I think one of the few major things holding back the internet from really being pervasive in our lives is the inherent cost. Anything that raises said cost = teh lose.
Tue Feb 12 13:07:40 2002
Tue Feb 12 14:48:13 2002
It looks like BT is counting on expanding language to broad meaning. IIRC, I don't think that's going to fly. From what I'm told it isn't tough to get around patents in many cases. Any variation from the BT patent and the way things are done now will count monumentally against them.
Plus there's the issue of time which could get everyone off scott free if it could be shown that so much time passed between the 1976 filing and the internet revolution, but I am unfamiliar with that part.
Tue Feb 12 15:41:01 2002
<supposition>
Isn't Tim Berners-Lee considered the 'father' of hyperlinking documents? If so, wouldn't this have some bearing on BT's supposed patent?
</supposition>
My intarweb history may be faulty; if it is, please send me some beer. ;)
Tue Feb 12 17:39:05 2002
The article is pretty unhelpful -- it seems that the judge is being deliberately dunderheaded, that's all.
If BT have patented hyperlinking, more power to them.
Tue Feb 12 22:01:30 2002
Tue Feb 12 22:39:20 2002
Your mom would probably do so and I doubt you'd call her "stupid".
She's and everyone else is uneducated in l33t web stuff. There's a diff.
BTW, Thalia is hot.
M.
(Edited by Madan at 2:40 pm on Feb. 12, 2002)
Wed Feb 13 01:11:31 2002