Jeremy's Blog
Register
< Back to OSY 1.0 thread list

OSY 1.0 Thread Viewer

Thread #: 1187

Filters.

Madan

Tue Nov 20 21:31:27 2001

http://www.theonion.com/onion3634/graphic_designer.html

J.

Riso

Tue Nov 20 22:20:35 2001

That's usefull, right?
Imitation Gruel

Tue Nov 20 22:27:14 2001

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I don't get it.
Madan

Tue Nov 20 22:43:40 2001

Why am I not surprised that you graphically, aesthetically deprived tech nerds would have that article take a Boeing over your heads?

M.

Imitation Gruel

Tue Nov 20 22:46:02 2001

aesthetically deprived

Hey now. Just because I've never used Photoshop in my entire life and don't have any real reason to ever do so doesn't mean I'm aesthetically deprived.

Now the 'tech nerd' bit I'll plead guilty to.

Madan

Tue Nov 20 22:48:58 2001

Photoshop happens to be the most important tool for art in the last 500 years, but yeah, no biggie.

M.

Imitation Gruel

Tue Nov 20 22:51:03 2001

Photoshop happens to be the most important tool for art in the last 500 years, but yeah, no biggie.

Really? I always thought it was...paint.

AllYorBaseRBelong2Us

Tue Nov 20 23:30:51 2001

Really? I always thought it was...paint.

Canvas has to rate right up there too.

HitScan

Wed Nov 21 02:04:07 2001


Photoshop happens to be the most important tool for art in the last 500 years, but yeah, no biggie.

Uh, I like computers and photoshop as much as the next tech nerd, but I'm gonna have to call shenanigans right here. The tools have little bearing on "the art" other than to make it a little easier to express. I have to agree with seta's sentiments on this one, It is the artist that is important to the art, not his tool of choice.

It was a damn funny article though. (I got the point ;) )