< Back to OSY 1.0 thread list

OSY 1.0 Thread Viewer

Thread #: 1111

Is nVidia Evil?

DuffMan

Fri Oct 26 09:01:16 2001

Ok, the motherboard for my next computer will either be a via KT266A or nForce based board. If I can find someone to buy my GF2MX, I could save a small amount of money by using the onboard video. The image quality might be crappy, but I could put in my 4Mb PCI Matrox card and switch the monitor if I play a 3d game. I'm looking for opinions on some of these issues:

Is nVidia an evil company? Do their actions warrant not buying their stuff.

Is it risky to buy a company's first ever chipset? Of course Via has quality/driver/compatibility problems of their own.

Also, I havent seen any reviews of the onboard video performance of nForce. I assume it would be similar to my GF2MX, maybe better since it would be with DDR ram.

Annother thing I want to bring up, is that I think nForce is going to be great for AMD. OEM's will jump on it like Clinton on an intern. It's got tons of integrated stuff, the nVidia drivers and support SHOULD be good. Of course it could have a lot problems too, but if it goes well, I see it as being a huge boost for AMD sales. The main problem for them isn't the procs obviously, its a little bit marketing, but a lot of it is OEM's shying away from Via boards, and Via's crappy level of support.

--end of rant--

(Edited by DuffMan at 4:03 am on Oct. 26, 2001)

Socrates

Fri Oct 26 09:08:02 2001

           
Socrates

Fri Oct 26 09:11:29 2001

IN the current market, most companies are having to cut corners.  They won't have the money to properly develop products, so, they will pull an Apple, let you buy the product, and do the R&D for them.  Now, if you don't mind that, go ahead...

I have a very big problem with it.  You pay the new stuff computer premium, and you take it in the ass, doing their development work for them, and you pay them to do it.

But, maybe I've not been around SF long enough, because I find that whole situation unbearable.

In other words, wait until the price drops, the bugs are worked out, and then buy, unless you really want to make the rich richer, and you poorer.

Socrates

Imitation Gruel

Fri Oct 26 09:42:56 2001

DuffMan: I can't even remember where I saw it now, but I remember reading a review of an nForce board, and the conclusion was that (on the 420 version) the integrated video was 20-30% slower than a GeForce2 MX 400.

So I wouldn't use the integrated video if I were you; it'd be a step down.

deathe

Sat Oct 27 01:51:58 2001

There have been a few reviews on the Nforce, and all of those where done on preproduction boards.

The information I have heard, and this is solely going by memory is that they will be comparable in speed to a GFMX400 *if* you get the 400 with the dual channel memory support.

Lemme see if I can find some linkage for ya.

deathe

Sat Oct 27 02:04:51 2001

http://www.amdmb.com/article-display.php?ArticleID=130

Has *some* review information on onboard video comparing it to a Geforce 3. Not a real good way to get a base line feel for the speed vs a GFMX.

Anand Does some more comparison's on the various Nforce chipsets and 3d performance of it, compared to other video cards, internal and external on the 220 and 440. In the UT benches he shows a GFMX400 vs integrated Video, and as shown by *that* test, the integrated is noticeably slower than the external, however, it is still faster than a ATI 7500, with what I would think to be decent speeds.


Gotta, talk more later.

I was wrong earlier when I stated the 400, I should have said 440 chipset.

deathe

Sat Oct 27 02:11:37 2001

http://www.anandtech.com/chipsets/showdoc.html?i=1535&p=1
anands review

I'm We Todd Did.

Imitation Gruel

Sat Oct 27 03:01:08 2001

deathe: Thanks for the linkages.
DeAthe

Sun Oct 28 04:33:02 2001

IG: No sweat, and keep an eye out, there is gonna be quite a bit more reviews coming out now that the boards are being readied for release.

Hmm, I really wanna get a dual athlon, but the nforce looks like a damn nice lan rig. :)

DuffMan

Sun Oct 28 08:09:23 2001

Anands review showed some disappointing onboard performance, but it was a while ago, and they might have some improvements since then.

Yeah, dual Athlons would be cool, but the whole SMP athlon situation is fuged up. With the non-MP athlons not being supported, and not working half the time, and the MP's costing a premium for what appears to be basically nothing.

I wonder how AYB's dual athlon attempt worked out...

EDIT: UPDATE

Found some newer benchmarks:

32 bit quake - not good

16 bit 3dmark2000 is pretty close. 32 bit showed more of a gap. So i guess integrated video might be a step down. Still it might be worth it to save the costs, plus nForce has slightly better memory performance. I think it will come down to which has the least number of problems.

(Edited by DuffMan at 2:33 am on Oct. 28, 2001)

DeAthe

Sun Oct 28 08:40:06 2001

Yea, looks like the limiting factor, as with all integrated video solutions, is memory bandwidth. The Nforce still needs to share the bandwidth w/ PCI and AGP doesn't it? That would explain the slowdown on 32bit depth.

Hell, even with the 440 speed, it's still damn playable IMHO. I myself don't play in 32bit color on 98% of the games. So, if it saves some cash, I'd go for it. You can always upgrade to a AGP card later on.

Riso

Sun Oct 28 12:10:17 2001

22Bit = meh.

But only as long as I have my V4.

Imitation Gruel

Sun Oct 28 12:48:34 2001

I think I'll still hold out for Matrox to release a highend 3d videocard. It's certainly more likely than ATi pulling their heads out of their asses WRT their drivers.

Damn forced compromises -- I want the best of ALL worlds!

PaulHill

Sun Oct 28 12:48:56 2001


Is nVidia an evil company? Do their actions warrant not buying their stuff.

Depends on your definition of "evil company".  If perpetuating capatalist decadance is evil, then yeah, they're evil.

If, OTOH you reserve evil as propping up corrupt goverments in Nigeria, then no, they're not.

And if you own a car, you're buying from evil companies all the time.

Moral stances - aren't they a bitch?

Imitation Gruel

Sun Oct 28 12:53:22 2001

AOL/Time Warner is one of the few companies I consider truly evil. Apple is another.
DeAthe

Tue Oct 30 03:48:13 2001

Hey, a review of a production board, the MSI

http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=45000232

Still reading it now.

DuffMan

Tue Oct 30 09:26:02 2001

Yep saw that. They say they are going to explore the integrated video in depth at a later time.
Riso

Tue Oct 30 20:12:29 2001

Why would ppl want to buy a nforce only because of the mem bandwidth?
DeAthe

Wed Oct 31 03:01:17 2001

Well, internal DD5.1 decoding is real nice, and it's done in hardware, so there's almost zero cpu usage on it.

That alone, I think would make it worth it. Although I'd like to hear more about the audio capabilities of the board. It sounds like it's going to be a very nice audio solution. Didn't Nvidia hire a bunch of the Aureal engineers to help with the design of the audio?

I myself am trying to decide if I want to go Dual AMD MP or single w/ Nforce.

And the memory bandwidth is a nice setup, actually, the chipset design is much more efficient than other offerings from VIA and AMD.

Just my .02 $.